Today's hottest deals

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 21:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 706
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 83.5
51% 68.7 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 44.6
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 332 357 370 361 374 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 492
Write 371
Mixed 297
SusWrite 356
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 26.6
103% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 155
126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 110 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 108
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66%
Great: 84%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
169GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 38.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 31.9
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.3
466% 6.43 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 1.4
498% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback