Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '17 at 05:42
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 293
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Palit(1569 1183) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 42.5
28% 36.7 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 28.3
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$57
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 158
Write 150
Mixed 143
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.33
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.28
134% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback