Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 16:33
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 138
61% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 283
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 29
Parallax 33
22% 29.8 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 34.3
24% 28 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 55 41 66 28 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 476
Write 344
Mixed 133
SusWrite 75.4
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 31.8
110% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 105
96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
42GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 89 88 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 488
Write 443
Mixed 352
SusWrite 113
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 31.7
112% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 158
147% 227 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 89%
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
26GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 90 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 439
Write 422
Mixed 346
SusWrite 102
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 28.3
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 160
147% 227 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 182 180 178 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 174
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 179
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback