QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.9 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 04:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 41.3
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 130
44% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 485
44% 368 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 206
58% 124 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 190
Splatting 146
144% 180 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 180
Mixed 153
130% 174 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.5
767% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 139 129 134 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 86.1
Write 104
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 131
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 82%
External USB3.0 2TB
886GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 163 148 155 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 192
Mixed 187
SusWrite 155
140% 189 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.6
460% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 9.5 8.9 7.3 8.9 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 108
Write 17.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 8
38% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15616 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback