Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 04:49
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 192
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 326
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 46
Parallax 41
37% 44 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 0.3
19% 26.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 222 224 165 220 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 423
Write 262
Mixed 262
SusWrite 199
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 32.1
124% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 236
184% 250 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
398GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 81 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 203
Write 18.4
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 79.6
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
309GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 70 70 70 70 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 64.8
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 66.2
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 161 163 162 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 153
Mixed 108
SusWrite 161
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 134 133 134 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 132
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
7GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 158
Write 26.4
Mixed 34
SusWrite 25.3
60% 61 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.3
184% 4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 35%
WD Elements SE 25FF 3TB
3TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 112 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 75.2
Write 106
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 111
128% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
265% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2666C19-8GNT Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH F4-2666C19-8GNT 24GB
2733, 2733, 2733 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 27.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 26
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback