Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 01:39
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 342
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 41
36% 43.7 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 0.2
19% 26 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 123 146 123 124 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 338
Write 286
Mixed 224
SusWrite 143
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 17.3
84% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 153
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 178 179 177 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 114
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 173
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
386GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 126
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 93.1
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
304GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 71 73 71 75 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 51
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 68
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
495GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 77.3
Write 53.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 80.4
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 57%
WD Elements SE 25FF 3TB
2TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 99 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 113
Write 105
Mixed 64
SusWrite 97.7
126% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 63%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
29GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 72.9
Write 4.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 24.8
37% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.9
214% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 26%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2666C19-8GNT Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH F4-2666C19-8GNT 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback