Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 06:55
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 151
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 255
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.5
10% 12.2 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 9
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 888
Write 824
Mixed 558
168% 757 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 69.6
240% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 708
552% 766 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$13
615GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47% Average
Read 75.7
Write 60.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 88.4
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback