Today's hottest deals

Asus X542UQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X542UQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X542UQ
Memory2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 08:47
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 93.8
48% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 117
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1A00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.3
4% 2.77 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B 250GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 82 92 77 74 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 272
Write 213
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 89.9
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 33.1
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 197
171% 256 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
185GB free
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 107 107 107 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 100
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 105
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 5% 20 29 21 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE069C
History: Score 16: 2R 1G 3B | Score 20: 3R 1G 2B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B
Typical X542UQ Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X542UQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback