Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 11:58
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 210
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 522
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 76.4
59% 49.6 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 67.2
42% 47.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$270
36GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 141 139 135 128 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 421
Write 156
Mixed 207
SusWrite 136
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 36.6
140% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 178
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
75GB free
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 427 413 415 412 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 422
Mixed 406
SusWrite 410
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 54
172% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 256
213% 304 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$60
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 96 81 95 89 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 69
Write 74.3
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 79.7
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
441GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 61 62 62 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 49.3
Write 44.6
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 60.7
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
155GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 66 67 60 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 59.1
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 63.5
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK04 3TB
660GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.8 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.9
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 3.8
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 61%
External USB3.0 DISK02 6TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 29.6
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 0
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.9
296% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 72%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 28.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 2.2
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK03 1TB
435GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 27 29 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 21
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 27.9
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 69%
External USB3.0 DISK00 14TB
10.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 29.9
Write 28
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 0.1
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.9
258% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback