Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 07:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 586
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8299) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.1
4% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 SSD 1T 1TB
917GB free (System drive)
Firmware: J00fHf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 405 385 387 372 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 391
Write 397
Mixed 358
SusWrite 388
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 31.2
106% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 140
117% 166 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 94%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 32GB
25GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 23 9 9 9.3 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 35
Write 33.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 11.7
28% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
37% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x8000] 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $41
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback