Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W (Brazil)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W (Brazil)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829A
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 829A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6709
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.8
6% 7.17 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256-HP 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 193 190 188 200 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 416
Write 365
Mixed 322
SusWrite 201
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 34.3
114% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 274
216% 300 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 92%
VendorCo ProductCode 125GB
32GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 21.3
SusWrite 0.1
18% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
27% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x8000] 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W (Brazil) Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W (Brazil)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback