Today's hottest deals

Asus K53SD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K53SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SD
Memory4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 10:28
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 191
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M
Asus(1043 1652) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 87 88 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86.8
Write 96.1
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 85.5
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSZ302G08-GDJEC Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SD Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback