Today's hottest deals

Asus K53SD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K53SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SD
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '18 at 01:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 159
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 378
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M
Asus(1043 1652) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.38 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.65
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 303 308 309 308 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 434
Write 420
Mixed 364
SusWrite 314
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 32.2
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 359
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSZ302G08-GDJEC Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SD Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback