Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 448
53% 408 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 77.7
46% 64.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 44.6
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$57
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 130 134 139 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 369
Write 346
Mixed 257
SusWrite 131
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 31.9
113% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 42.2
40% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 130%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 80 83 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 130
Write 133
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 79.4
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 83%
MD4000GBDS 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 135 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 67
SusWrite 135
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 93%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$144
477GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 79 83 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 78.9
Write 72
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 79.4
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 55%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
846GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 114 119 120 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 106
Write 97.5
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 114
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 81 86 84 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 63.2
Write 87.9
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 85
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 27.8
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 29.4
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.7
550% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback