Today's hottest deals

Centrium C2018-H310CH5-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCentrium C2018-H310CH5-M2  (all builds)
MotherboardCentrium C2018-H310CH5-M2
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 14:56
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 200
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 314
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Elitegroup(1019 A55D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3400832AS 400GB-$68
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 38 16 16 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 45.5
Write 60.9
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 21.6
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C2018-H310CH5-M2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Centrium C2018-H310CH5-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback