Today's hottest deals

Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 18.6
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 180
49% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 255
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 66.2
57% 69.9 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 58.2
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 367
Mixed 339
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 37.7
122% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 248
190% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3400832AS 400GB-$68
360GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 18.7
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 66.9
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 331
12% 331 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 26.9" 1280 720 IVM664E PL2792UH
Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback