Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R3.0  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 377
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3499) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 2.4
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.4
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 50 43 49 44 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 300
Write 356
Mixed 313
SusWrite 63.8
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 37.6
132% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 120
98% 135 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
454GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 116 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback