Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99H
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 17:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 153
58% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 441
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 73.7
43% 60.9 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 41.6
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 369 372 301 119 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 309
Write 374
Mixed 319
SusWrite 277
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 37.3
133% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 93.8
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 138
120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
459GB free
Firmware: A800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 164 170 173 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 166
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 169
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC atermiter 24GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback