Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 16 2-Core 15.3 19% 23.8 Pts	4-Core 16.2 8-Core 16.2 2% 16.2 Pts	64-Core 15.4 1% 15.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor 6Y080M0 80GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: YAR512W0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 49 51 49 50 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 37.8 Write 45.2 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 48.9 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 32%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 9.2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 2.7 11% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.56% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.7 6% 2.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.9 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-240AMDBench 24%, 462 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	3x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $30

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16