Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TV11HC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TV11HC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard VG50_HC_HR
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 12:19
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 127
58% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0649) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 78 75 74 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 82.1
Write 85.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 75
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 62%
Micromax D303 16GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5 6.2 6.4 5.4 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 10.2
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 6.1
16% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.7
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 10%
Micromax D303 1GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 23
Write 22.2
Mixed 24
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 3
294% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB
666, 666 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TV11HC Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TV11HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback