Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$215
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 174
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,275
113% 960 Pts
64-Core 2,250
139% 2,250 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$501
Palit(1569 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 34.6
26% 33.2 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 44.2
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 694 673 651 633 619 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,102
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 687
239% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 71.3
244% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 1,264
920% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 225%
Great: 346%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
462GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 481 487 492 491 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 452
SusWrite 488
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.5
226% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 374
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
177GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 159 158 159 161 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 109
Write 140
Mixed 123
SusWrite 161
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
327% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78%
Great: 97%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
125GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 118 118 121 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
Read 114
Write 78.4
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 119
118% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
222GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 118 118 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 113
Write 138
Mixed 114
SusWrite 119
168% 121 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
562GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 104 105 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 131
Write 113
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 106
146% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.8
259% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 44.6
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.2
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback