Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$214
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 208
2-Core 417
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,503
139% 1,160 Pts
64-Core 2,373
147% 2,373 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
EVGA(3842 4567) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 178
Parallax 171
160% 182 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2559 2563 2569 1608 1505 1516 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,532
Write 2,611
Mixed 2,001
SusWrite 2,053
518% 2,299 MB/s
4K Read 73.8
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 110
376% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,990
DQ Write 1,764
DQ Mixed 1,850
1,394% 1,868 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 426%
Great: 435%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 44 35 36 31 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 484
Mixed 434
SusWrite 82.9
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 61.5
208% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 230
204% 306 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
308GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 489 489 490 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 458
SusWrite 490
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 66.5
228% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
640GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 184 183 185 184 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 144
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 183
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
28GB free, PID 0754
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.2 7.2 7.5 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.4
10% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
139% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 C36 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 76
MC Write 72.4
MC Mixed 67.4
206% 71.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 32.6
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 182%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 3,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 253%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,097
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback