MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 206
2-Core 402
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,451
132% 1,107 Pts
64-Core 2,372
147% 2,372 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
109% 138 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 139
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 122 158 2.8 1.8 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 467
Write 392
Mixed 409
SusWrite 113
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 22.3
114% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 46.1
80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 92%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 105 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 121
Write 114
Mixed 72
SusWrite 105
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 1
12% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 39%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
255GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 453 445 450 463 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 432
Mixed 425
SusWrite 456
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 50.6
163% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 335
252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
845GB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 29 42 55 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 45.5
Write 56.1
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 39.1
60% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 63%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 116 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 114
140% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.8
293% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 11,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4 - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,127
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback