Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Americanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191209
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 136 55% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 411 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 8D95) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.9% Above average	Lighting 76.5 Reflection 74.7 Parallax 73 62% 74.7 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 59 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 452 455 405 359 316 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,235 Write 760 Mixed 752 SusWrite 396 175% 786 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 20.4 123% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 327 259% 359 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 200%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 127GB free Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 172 38 113 103 108 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.8% Average	Read 235 Write 200 Mixed 168 SusWrite 121 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 16.5 66% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 66.5 DQ Mixed 14.4 31% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 395GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 160 159 164 163 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 160 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 161 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	3x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1027 512GBWDCBench 206%, 4,494 samples	3x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	10x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	7x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	7x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $182

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16