Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '22 at 11:27
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 38.8 1-Core 54.6 2-Core 71.6 33% 55 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 93.6 13% 97.9 Pts	64-Core 72.4 4% 72.4 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.2% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 76.8 Parallax 161 91% 117 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 152 Splatting 118 107% 132 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 396 154 189 133 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 1,157 Write 861 Mixed 746 SusWrite 238 167% 750 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 14.7 96% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 134 112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 200%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 156 183 184 182 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 197 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 168 104% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB 9,486 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 4.6 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	194x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	132x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	80x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16