HP Z230 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z230 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1906
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 12:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 184
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 345
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 250GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52008100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 131 177 92 141 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 420
Write 392
Mixed 387
SusWrite 182
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 40.7
139% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 3.8
92% 219 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
185GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 36 41 59 61 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 87.2
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 57.6
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YKO 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback