HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 14:23
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 150
56% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 272
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.1
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 143 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 299
Write 165
Mixed 200
SusWrite 139
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 16.1
60% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 20.6
16% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Alketron Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G1F1 12GB
1600, 1333, 1067 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $151
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback