Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 02:22
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 433
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 31.3
21% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 336
Write 150
Mixed 209
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 8.14
44% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 2.77
23% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 90%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-75A7B0 640GB
49GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 30.4
Mixed 29.4
39% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.36
76% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
21GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 7.76
23% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback