Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '17 at 03:24
Run Duration622 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 121
51% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 12
7% 9.82 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 8.61
6% 7.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 373
Write 303
Mixed 264
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 9.67
84% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 10.2
16% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 116
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.24
102% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
14GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 42.1
Write 46.8
Mixed 41.8
33% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 33%
hp v115p 8GB
8GB free, PID 3d07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.6
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.98
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
27% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 7%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Read 17
Write 4.55
Mixed 7.56
10% 9.71 MB/s
4K Read 3.76
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.13
23% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 8%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 8.87
Mixed 6.92
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.79
43% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 24GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback