Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 02:17
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 168
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 466
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.1% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 86.4
78% 92.6 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 76.3
70% 87.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 295 279 274 290 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 443
Write 362
Mixed 319
SusWrite 282
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 282
233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
765GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 422 365 358 380 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 862
Mixed 893
SusWrite 378
171% 762 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 43.2
143% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 480
355% 472 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 125%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 19 20 22 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 95 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 71.4
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 94.9
105% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
231% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37.2
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 34.1
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 52%
ST8000DM 004-2U9188 8TB
4TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 4.7
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback