Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z490-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '22 at 03:35
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 292 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 1,007 95% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,452 90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 76.4 Parallax 76.7 59% 75.2 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 69.4 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 465 470 477 483 483 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 475 Mixed 350 SusWrite 471 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 38.9 143% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 277 229% 330 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Hyundai Sapphire S3T480G 480GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 447GB free Firmware: Q0120B SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 439 440 447 448 448 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 487 Write 429 Mixed 400 SusWrite 442 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 87 4K Mixed 20.5 111% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 24.7 76% 158 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 89%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 227GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 169 164 162 163 165 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 479 Mixed 429 SusWrite 216 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 50.8 168% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,684 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 19.4 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 20.9 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 126%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	110x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	42x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	48x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	26x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	25x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,274

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16