Acer Aspire E5-573G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZORO_BH
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 03:12
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 157
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 227
32% 233 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 098A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.1
0% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 39 41 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 64.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 33.1
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 480GB
445GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 37 37 14 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 27.1
14% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.2
372% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GS6BFR8A-PBHJ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-573G Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-573G - $680

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback