Acer E5-573

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer E5-573  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZORO_BH
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '18 at 23:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 99.4
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 142
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 098A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 5.38
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 81 82 94 105 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 78.5
Write 122
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 86.1
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
101% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GS6BFR8A-PBHJ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 3.2
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5-573 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer E5-573

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback