Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 14:07
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 724
78% 619 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 22CA) 2GB
Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13.6
0% 9.13 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 138 53 26 42 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 453
Write 212
Mixed 335
SusWrite 57.5
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 34.5
140% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 13.4
75% 172 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 90%
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB
158GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 35.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 64.7
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
206GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 82
Write 81
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 81.8
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MK3265GSX H 320GB
298GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 3.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 39.3
Write 5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 4.9
14% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming K5 Builds (Compare 1,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $568
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback