Today's hottest deals

Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive404% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$77
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 327
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 739
82% 645 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$319
Asus(1043 87BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (76 fps cap detected)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 76
Parallax 76
54% 72.8 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 76
Splatting 66.2
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2220 2297 2316 2410 2310 1568 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 2,499
Write 2,358
Mixed 2,187
SusWrite 2,187
520% 2,308 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 96.4
332% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 1,359
DQ Mixed 1,517
1,137% 1,520 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 404%
Great: 507%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 125 112 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 415
Mixed 366
SusWrite 163
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 40.7
152% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 213
188% 280 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
102GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 317 319 317 317 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 467
Mixed 445
SusWrite 336
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59.5
206% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 304 305 305 305 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 467
Mixed 408
SusWrite 319
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 58.5
208% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
38GB free, PID b200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 86 86 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 138
Write 143
Mixed 52
SusWrite 87
136% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 28.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 52 60 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical H610M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback