Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G31M-ES2C  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091012
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 23:12
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 47.2
1-Core 9
2-Core 25.4
21% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 40.1
8-Core 40.2
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 41.6
3% 41.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12
Parallax 12.1
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 14 10 13 25 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 47.8
Write 19.8
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 14.8
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
3GB free
Firmware: K2AOAH0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 30 22 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 25.9
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 34%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
25GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 86 93 85 84 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 155
Write 156
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 81.6
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$119
30GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 87 92 83 83 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 110
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 81.1
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
35GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 23
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 13.5
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 48%
ADATA HV620 1TB
11GB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 13.4
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
111GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 18.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 13.2
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G31M-ES2C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback