Today's hottest deals

Maxdata *

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMaxdata *  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5VDC-TVM TE
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 53.9
32% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 87.5
8-Core 98.8
12% 93.2 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 370
Nvidia(10DE 0491) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.27 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 12 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 36.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 12.8
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
68GB free
Firmware: PF2OA69A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 46 52 46 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 43.2
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 48.8
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical * Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Maxdata *

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback