Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 147
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 397
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 67.6
56% 70 fps
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 66.8
61% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 142 72 131 83 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 390
Write 230
Mixed 214
SusWrite 90.5
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 0.3
27% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 60.5
69% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 163 165 144 174 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 166
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback