Today's hottest deals

Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 01:43
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 410
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 19.3
0% 11.4 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 10
11% 14 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 118 75 76 72 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 464
Write 253
Mixed 327
SusWrite 137
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 37.3
154% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 183
162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 105%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 42.5
Write 31.6
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 32.5
45% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
129% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback