Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 10:20
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 252
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 811
77% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 12.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 153
Parallax 153
124% 153 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
8GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 60 61 62 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 180
Write 63.8
Mixed 91
SusWrite 59.8
22% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 33.4
120% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 71.4
54% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 971 531 482 461 462 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 660
Mixed 1,545
SusWrite 560
289% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.7
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,213
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 862
682% 958 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 270%
Great: 410%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
367GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 140 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 139
81% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LVM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 116 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 74.5
Write 116
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 116
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 75 72 76 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 73
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%
Garmin nuvi Flash 4GB
0GB free, PID 23cc
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.6
1% 0.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.3
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback