Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYHN
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 14:58
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 38.2
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 128
42% 77 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 118
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.4
0% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 147 147 148 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 305
Write 150
Mixed 169
SusWrite 147
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 23.2
109% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 180
140% 195 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
12GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 5.9
10% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback