Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Vivo AIO V222GAR_V222GA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivo AIO V222GAR_V222GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V222GAR
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Memory 11.9
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 38.6
14% 25.1 Pts
4-Core 38.7
8-Core 38.3
5% 38.5 Pts
64-Core 17.3
1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1752) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3256B-AB 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 197 125 130 123 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 68.2
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 139
24% 101 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 12.8
34% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 106
81% 109 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 GB/s
Latency 431
9% 431 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 23 60 0" 1920 1009 MS_0003
Typical ASUS Vivo AIO V222GAR_V222GA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS Vivo AIO V222GAR_V222GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback