Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory13 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 5160
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 77.9
40% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 77.5
8-Core 77
10% 77.2 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
95GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 5.5 7.8 109 193 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 185
Write 207
Mixed 187
SusWrite 86.6
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 40
32% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.4 4.1 27 49 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 57.1
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 22.5
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$24
422GB free
Firmware: SD26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.3 4.4 27 50 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 83.5
Write 81
Mixed 67
SusWrite 22.8
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 58%
JMicron Tech 240GB
116GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 2.2 3.2 25 39 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 57.8
Write 47.6
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 17.9
57% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
108% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 205%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
4GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.2 4 4.2 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Read 12.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 3.2
9% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback