Today's hottest deals

HP SLIC-BPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP SLIC-BPC  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A73h
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '17 at 18:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 5160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 59.2
38% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 58.6
8-Core 59.7
8% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 59.3
4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1300) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 0.96
1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 211
Write 158
Mixed 130
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 6.54
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 56.1
DQ Mixed 7.46
15% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 95%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$83
135GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 45
Write 47.5
Mixed 38.8
33% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.38
70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLIC-BPC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP SLIC-BPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback