Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U7500 42 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 10.9 2-Core 23 18% 24 Pts	4-Core 23.7 8-Core 22.7 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 24.1 2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5089 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 731 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 45 36 55 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1580951498	35.1% Below average	Read 129 Write 88.7 Mixed 91.6 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 16.3 72% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 74 DQ Write 55.1 DQ Mixed 40.6 37% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 118%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 6GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 13 Mixed 21.1 26% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 1.46 139% 2.64 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x62GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 2 slots used 62GB SRIMM DDR2 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.32% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.32% Great: 8%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16