Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Assacom [Desk] ECS 2 B360H5M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS B360H5-M2
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 216 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 624 70% 552 Pts	64-Core 561 35% 561 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.5% Very good	Lighting 95.9 Reflection 95.4 Parallax 87.5 78% 92.9 fps	MRender 98.2 Gravity 89.1 Splatting 75.2 70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 301 288 295 258 244 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 456 Write 460 Mixed 360 SusWrite 289 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 37.8 115% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 261 206% 290 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 51 49 51 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 52.7 Write 85.2 Mixed 128 SusWrite 48.9 60% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 245% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 14 9.7 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 9.9 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 13.4 20% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 2.6 121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB 1,305 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.3% Outstanding	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 29.3 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 26.5 76% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M378A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 98%, 1,305 samples	2x
CL19-19-19 D4-2666 Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 24GBUnknownBench 85%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16