HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 581
66% 515 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
49.3% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 57
49% 59.7 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 57.7
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 367 370 364 370 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 1,739
Mixed 1,267
SusWrite 438
270% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 52.6
177% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 1,342
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 1,085
823% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 186%
Great: 271%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
691GB free
Firmware: HPH5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 161 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 185
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 160
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
167GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 40 45 45 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 44.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 43
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 16GB
2666, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback