Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T5 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V20.3
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 07:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 611
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 896
55% 896 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 69%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1146) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 339 340 351 361 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1,161
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 391
223% 994 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 46.3
165% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 434
354% 509 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 15.3
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE084D
Typical TULPAR T5 V20.3 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback