Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 23:21
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 247
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 676
71% 567 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 31.4
16% 26.4 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 24.7
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100n 512G 512GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07828
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 79 86 112 123 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 392
Write 401
Mixed 184
SusWrite 134
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 24.7
102% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 132
96% 129 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 106%
Toshiba HG6 128GB
86GB free
Firmware: JULA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 458 457 445 449 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 459
Mixed 433
SusWrite 451
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 41
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 352
261% 344 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
20GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 70.3
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
71GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 42 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 188
Write 41.8
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 43
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R022D408GX2-3200C16A 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 20
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 135% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback