Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 12:02
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 59.1
40% 58 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 58.6
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
MSI(1462 2875) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 23.9
15% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 20.8
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 151 174 147 284 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 380
Write 321
Mixed 178
SusWrite 188
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 22.2
64% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 142
108% 150 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
105GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 79
Write 40.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 81.5
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-023.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 3.3
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-HD3-A Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback